Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syswox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar ⨹   15:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Syswox

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no reliable third party sources for notability. Refs 1 &3 are from their own web site. The Businessweek ref is just a directory entry. The nasscom article cannot be located, but is apparently a mere PR announcement./  DGG ( talk ) 03:00, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete – After several source searches, does not appear to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:17, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:28, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - software company article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in multiple sources. As DGG notes, refs provided are incidental mentions or not WP:RS.Dialectric (talk) 12:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.