Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tímea Antal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With no objections after three weeks, I'm treating this as an expired PROD. Will undelete on request. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Tímea Antal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Coverage is spotty - to put it plainly, it's basically confined to tabloid trash - and while the subject has been the runner-up in a couple of prominent competitions, she hasn't actually won any. Fails WP:MUSBIO. - Biruitorul Talk 22:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:05, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:06, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:06, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 22:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * There were two discussions on Hungarian wikipedia about her notability; the first was closed with no consensus, but later she had her album debut at #4 on the Hungarian album chart, so the second discussion was closed with the article being kept. Archive of Mahasz charts (results can't be linked directly, enter her name as "Antal Timi"). – Alensha   talk  23:39, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I realize I'm probably in the minority here, but I take seriously WP:BASIC ("People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject"), in the sense that I don't regard someone as notable simply for having reached a position on a chart, but without having achieved anything in the way of significant coverage. (A position, by the way, consistent with WP:MUSBIO: "Musicians may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria".)
 * So unless some meaningful coverage can be shown, I still say we should delete; otherwise we are left with a perfectly useless permanent stub ("Tímea Antal is a singer who once reached position X on chart Y. The end.") - Biruitorul Talk 03:54, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Most singers are only mentioned in tabloid press, you won't find scholarly articles about them in JSTOR... Anyway, I won't cry if the article gets deleted, as I'm no fan of hers, but strictly speaking she has some notability. – Alensha   talk  19:52, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   12:33, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.