Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T-22


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. I've also moved the disambiguation page here. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

T-22

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unknown film by unknown people. Impossible to verify beyond a MySpace page which indicates that this may be a student film. No third-party coverage whatsoever. Pichpich (talk) 03:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: the film is notable enough for wikipedia.  Dwilso  04:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete probably a student film, and even if not, severely non-notable. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  04:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable self production; might be a hoax.  RC-0722 247.5/ 1  04:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Google reveals nothing related to it, so it isn't notable. —  Wen li  (reply here) 04:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and replace with dab I'm leaving one at Talk:T-22/temp. 70.55.84.13 (talk) 05:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, good job! Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I'm in favour of deleting the article first though: this will avoid the temptation for the original contributor to simply revert to his earlier spammish version. Pichpich (talk) 14:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Can't we just be bold like people say and replace with the dab? Also, why can't the proposed dab be at Talk:T-22 instead of creating a talk page for an article that doesn't exist (i.e. T-22/temp)Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually, its a subpage of the non-existant talk page Talk:T-22, not the talk page for article T-22/temp... and this is how non-copyright-violation pages are created at WP:CV, which is why it sits at the subpage of the talk page. Articles aren't supposed to have subpages, so T-22/temp would usually be an illegal article. If you look at any talk archive page, the article tab is also redlinked. ( ie. Talk:xxx/Archive 1 has a redlink for xxx/Archive 1, even though "Archive 1" is a talk archive for "Talk:xxx", which is the talk page for article "xxx" ) 70.55.84.13 (talk) 05:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that information on subpages and whatnot. I still think we need to be bold and do the replacement but, it's only my opinion. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this and then move the disambiguation page over, as above. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 16:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 01:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.