Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T-commerce (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per sources brought forward in discussion. RL0919 (talk) 05:13, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

T-commerce
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dictionary article Rathfelder (talk) 07:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I would love to see the kind of dictionaries you are using at home. They must be quite voluminous. Congratulations, btw. on challenging the justification of even the definition of a term that has over 1.5 billion hits on Google. On the not-so-light side: How come you can only think of deleting a valid start? I, personally would find myself prompted to add stuff. Not erase. But, I guess, that's (unfortunately, even on WP) up to everybody's personal taste. -- Kku (talk) 07:34, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * WP:NOTDICTIONARYRathfelder (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your verbose and instructive commentary. I think I understood the gist what you meant the first time. ;) -- Kku (talk) 08:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I am leaning toward delete. 1.5 billion hits on google just means that there are lots of places in English where a word ending with t is concatenated with commerce. The best source I have found is pages 190 - 203 of "".  Non trivial it may be, but it seems to lack independence.  I think we could maybe have an article on televised marketing that takes a redirect from t-commerce. Rockphed (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:35, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Passes WP:GNG. Business and marketing magazines, newspapers, and journals are writing on this topic, see here for example. My university library gave these sources in a search "Investigating User Adoption of T-commerce" by Eunjin Kim ; Seongpil Ko, 2011 First ACIS/JNU International Conference on Computers, Networks, Systems and Industrial Engineering, May 2011, pp.95-99; Trintech Partners With Industry Leaders to Form TV Linux Alliance to Exploit Opportunities for tCommerce, PR Newswire, Jun 13, 2001, p.1; "TRY KIZAN'S TCOMMERCE AND BAG THE WEB" by Whitehead, Ingrid, Computer Telephony, Nov, 1998, Vol.6(11), p.76; "VOD rolls on without Hollywood, for now; applications, tcommerce and owning patents", Paul Kagan, Cable World, May 20, 2002, Vol.14(20), p.42; "Extending the TAM for a t-commerce" by Yu, Jieun ; Ha, Imsook ; Choi, Munkee ; Rho, Jaejeung, Information & Management, 2005, Vol.42(7), pp.965-97; "The incidence of incentives for t-commerce acceptance: improving television as a distribution channel" by Arroyo-Cañada, Francisco-Javier ; Gil-Lafuente, Jaime, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 04 April 2016, Vol.31(3), pp.426-435; "Delivery Agent Joins Forces with Toyota to Introduce T-Commerce Campaign", Wireless News, March 8, 2015; "Direct Marketing and the Productive Capacity of Commercial Television: T-commerce, Advanced Advertising, and the Audience Product", Mcguigan, Lee, Television & New Media, February 2015, Vol.16(2), pp.196-214; "Grocery Shopping via T-Commerce in Korea: New Shopping Channel Adoption Behavior Based on Prior E-Commerce Experience", Lee, Dongmin ; Jeong, Haeyoung ; Cho, Jongpyo ; Jeong, Jaeseok ; Moon, Junghoon, March 2015, International Food and Agribusiness Management Review,; "T-Commerce", Cablefax Daily, Jun 13, 2012, Vol.23; "All eyes zero on emerging T-commerce", Kate Fitzgerald, Advertising Age, Jan 15, 2001, Vol.72(3), p.s12, etc. That's just the tip of the iceberg. There's a lot of published research on this topic and newscoverage. The article should be tagged for expansion but not deleted.4meter4 (talk) 02:45, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think we've now seen enough nominations of alleged dictionary articles from this user to know that they are not thoroughly researched WP:BEFORE nominating. So I'll just agf on what 4meter4 has found + this one I found myself just to make sure. SpinningSpark 23:32, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Now there are references I am happy to withdraw. Rathfelder (talk) 08:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.