Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T.N. Baker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nousernamesleft copper, not wood 17:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

T.N. Baker

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently non-notable author. All of the information seems to be a rework of the bio on her website, including the part about liking hot bubble baths.  BradV  22:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * KEEP A quick google reveals that this is areal novelist, she has a novel out form St. martin's press, no small accomplishment.  The novels appear to be black romance novels, or, perhaps, black chick-lit.  I'm pretty ognorant about both genres.  However, I think that four novels (that's how amny appear on Amazon) from real(i.e. not vanity) presses qualifies a writer for Wikipedia.  About the article, however, what can I say.  Wholly inadequate. But hang a needs improvement tag on it, rather than deleting it.Elan26 (talk) 00:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Elan
 * Delete There are no reliable secondary sources that establish notability. The only source is a personal website. Fails WP:BIO. Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 03:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   —Captain-tucker (talk) 17:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, only source I could find was, does not appear to have multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability to pass WP:BIO since the depth of coverage is not substantial. --Captain-tucker (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 05:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is nothing to suggest that this writer is notable in encyclopedic terms i.e. having made a significant contribution to the field of work. Wikipedia isn't simply a list of every living author who has managed to get published.Austin46 (talk) 09:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.