Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T.U.F.F. Puppy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 19:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

T.U.F.F. Puppy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnotable future television series that has received no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources nor even confirmed to be in production or being released. Only word about it has been the single press release. Fails WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. Prod removed without reason by SPA. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 06:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 06:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Profound lack of sources . Abductive  (reasoning) 07:58, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and address current lack of sources with such as Big Cartoon Database, Toonzone, and Animation Magazine. Its a safe bet that the series will receive more press. Keeping and expanding through the course of regular editing serves the project.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Three sites reprinting the same press release is not "more" press, its none at all. You can not make your own notability by releasing press releases. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 19:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * While containing much the same information as would be expected, the three articles have differences in length, content, and author. Calling something a press release does not make it one... so perhaps you can provide an official press release from Nickelodeon so comparisons can be made.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:47, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: I agree with Schmidt - Ret.Prof (talk) 16:28, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete The press release is quoted in full in the toonzone.net references and was paraphrased in the other two. There is no indication when the 13 episodes will start airing, but I suspect it will be in fall 2010.  Given that time lag, we are better off deleting now and restoring the material if and when the series airs. Racepacket (talk) 12:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Collectonian, if the network sends out a press release it makes little sense to question if the show is in production or being released. - Mgm|(talk) 09:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Um, how so? It was announced, that is not a blood contract to actually put it in production or release it. Those press releases are old and it still has not been released. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 14:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep. It will air on Nick in 2010, and they have confirmed it. Dalekusa (talk) 19:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Where? Can you provide actual confirmation beyond a single press release? Wikipedia articles are not created based on future] possible notability, but the notability it has now, which is none. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 19:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * (ec) No they haven't. Besides, we need third party sources that say more than, "um, there's this show, which might come out a year from now, maybe". Abductive  (reasoning) 19:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, or redirect to Butch Hartman until the show actually exists rather than the current state of just having been ordered by a network. Sarilox (talk) 03:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - press releases don't strike me as neutral or reliable. Unreleased, so seems like a WP:CRYSTAL case (provided that ample evidence can be shown to the contrary, which I have not seen); maybe after it airs.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  03:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL if this becomes a TV series it will become an article. Polargeo (talk) 15:15, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.