Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. Berry Bruce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Apparently my BEFORE sucks; will add some of the sources provided to article. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

T. Berry Bruce

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears not ot be notable on his own account; salient sources appear to come down to one "holder of official position changed"-type of communique (the Advocate piece), and several list/incidental mentions. I couldn't find any more in-depth coverage. - If "official executioner" confers automatic notability, like being an elected official, that's another matter, but I doubt it? -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep covered by United Press International here, CBC News here, mentioned in this book, this one, this WaPo article, and others. I might change my mind, but for now my vote stands.Eddie891 Talk Work 18:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ...well strike me dead. The UPI and CBC articles are actually really good. I think DuckDuckGo is not dishing up the goods for me... if others agree that these constitute sufficient sourcing, I might just withdraw this thing. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. --IndyNotes (talk) 18:15, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  00:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  00:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  00:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  00:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Seems that being "At the time, Bruce was Mississippi's executioner, in fact the only state executioner in the United States whose identity was a matter of public record." - garners SIGCOV.Icewhiz (talk) 07:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.