Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. Hayden Barnes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. G7 applies Courcelles 01:17, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

T. Hayden Barnes

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * This person does not meet WP:BIO and is only notable for one event - a lawsuit against his university. The article is currently heavily reliant on sources from the website of an organisation involved in this lawsuit. Furthermore, the article is an autobiography and this edit would appear to be a request by the subject to delete it. SmartSE (talk) 10:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ray  Talk 16:36, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 17:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Interesting incident, but in the end a person notable for just the one event. The event itself might be borderline notable, but case was resolved in lower courts and involved nothing new legally; doesn't even seem to have been a campus controversy in general. (But good for Mr. Barnes for taking a stand!) EEng (talk) 22:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. As primary author (and subject) I agree entry lacks significance and impartiality. Please remove. thbarnes (talk) 05:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I am sure he is a great kid, and his family is so pround of him, but is clearly not notable. We have to be firm that Wikipedia is not a webhost or Facebook page.  Just one news event, especially about a case currently on appeal, does not make one notable.  When he gets on a law journal, graduates from law school, gets admitted to the bar, runs for Congress, and gets acclaim in major newspapers and magazines for his ongoing work in energy law, then let's talk. Bearian (talk) 19:35, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.