Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. L. Orcutt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:11, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

T. L. Orcutt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Although this article has been around for seven years, and has many incoming and outgoing links, I am just unable to see how it satisfies WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. I'm looking for significant coverage of the author and/or his books and I'm not finding it. A Google search brings up many many directory listings and Wikipedia mirrors but nothing in-depth about the author.

Similarly, the articles about his books are heavy on plot detail and light on sources. So I will also nominate them as part of this process.

... disco spinster   talk  20:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The Path of Return Trilogy
 * Letters from the Afterworld
 * Collateral Karma
 * Jamayah: Adventures on the Path of Return
 * Pre-Existing Condition (novel)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting as no discussion has taken place.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Note that a total of six articles are nominated for deletion herein.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting as no discussion has taken place.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 16:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't appear to meet WP:AUTHOR, WP:ACADEMIC or WP:OCCULTTAROTPROFESSIONAL. Additionally none of the books appear to be notable, I could find no significant coverage of any of them, so delete all of those too.--Pontificalibus (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete all do not meet any notability standards.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.