Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. Love


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Awkward, but there seems to be enough discussion following relisting Fritzpoll (talk) 08:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

T. Love
The following remarks are struck out because they were made in bad faith by a now blocked sockpupeteer Beeblebrox (talk) 22:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC) : ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log) not notable; blatant advertisement/promotional Gmatsuda (talk) 23:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Comment: FYI: Duplicate article was speedy deleted for CSD A7. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 23:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - 149.142.220.74 (talk) 18:43, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - 71.138.125.138 (talk) 05:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: Advertisement. Also fails WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC and WP:NOTE. - 68.183.104.7 (talk) 23:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 03:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

*Delete - per above. (Damn though... I wish those IP votes counted. This is why they should create accounts). Versus22 talk 06:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC) ✅ Is it alright to close? Sorry, I wasn't aware about the sockpuppet situation. Versus22 talk 19:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO, WP:NOTMYSPACE and WP:MUSIC. Last paragraph, where the subject proclaims to have managed Cut Chemist (among other things) is full of lies. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 06:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Versus22, could you please read the background on this article? The IP votes were discounted because they were all sockpuppets of the nominator, who was banned for extensive socking and vote-stacking on AFDs he had started. There is no dispute over this. I don't know why that wasn't noted in the relisting. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to T.Love While I hate to see the blocked sockpupeteer get their way, they probably didn't need to bother with the vote stacking on this one. An aspiring artist who never "broke through" and instead had a series of low-level music industry jobs is what I'm seeing here, and I think Doc Strange is right that most of the last section is WP:BALLS. Also a nice troutslap for whoever did the sloppy DRV closing and incomplete relist with no note about the socking.  Beeblebrox (talk) 23:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice that there was another article with a similar name. The Polish band seems to be notable enough and this would make a good redirect as it is a likely search term. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 00:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.