Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. Michelle Nelson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 20:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

T. Michelle Nelson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for self published author. Only one book is in worldcat, with only 2 libraries holding it  DGG ( talk ) 23:36, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (constabulary)  @ 23:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (deliver)  @ 23:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find anything to show that she's ultimately notable enough to be in Wikipedia. I see where she's developing a bit of a fan following in the reading blogosphere, but none of that is considered to be a reliable source as far as Wikipedia is concerned. The closest thing I can find to a reliable source is a press release printed in a local paper and that's not usable either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:21, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks coverage needed to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a speck of evidence this person is notable. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 15:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - for the reasons above. Uberaccount (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.