Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. P. Rajeevan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus of the "crappy keeps and crappy deletes make the consensus impossible to determine" type. T. Canens (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

T. P. Rajeevan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable writer.No significant awards. No significant books or reviews upon him as a poet to make him notable.Just statements from people can't make him notable.The article should be deleted in accordance with deletion policies.--Poet009 (talk) 11:42, 28 January 2011 (UTC) delete not notableThisbites (talk) 19:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Only 950ish ghits, but he had a few articles/interviews in the Indian National Newspaper.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 15:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete.But only in one newspaper, the Hindu.He has been associated with that newspaper as a contributor also.more references are required to establish notability.An author bio cannot be notable like this.--Poet009 (talk) 16:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep He's a poet who has published 3 books of poetry and one of his poems was introduced in to film. Obviously the article needs to be sourced better but he deserves a chance.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 01:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Just publishing books can't make anyone notable.He should introduce something new or something appreciated by a large group of people not just by few. And just one major newspaper features him every time that too the one with which he is associated as a contributor.No other.So notability is a big question here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poet009 (talk • contribs) 08:09, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per the exclusive article about the subject appeared today in The Hindu newspaper. Salih  ( talk ) 06:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.