Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T3ROBOT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 06:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

T3ROBOT


non notable class project; prod removed. Brianyoumans 02:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete because right now, it's non-notable, but if it came out, it would be notable, so I'm somewhat divided on this article, but leaning delete. WikiBot 02:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice, but tell us about it once it's done and working. WP:NOT a crystal ball. Seraphimblade 02:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete A computer playing tic-tac-toe? Been there, done that (with tinker toys, no less!).  Non notable, unless it uses tic-tac-toe to figure out nuclear war is unwinable. --Transfinite 02:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I saw this one during RC patrol and did not bring it to AfD only because it was prodded already. Not notable project.-- Hús  ö  nd  06:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no relavent ghits = no media coverage. It's simply something that's been done before, better. --Daniel Olsen 06:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Big  top  07:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP is not a crystal ball. --User:Arnzy (talk· contribs) 07:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable non-class project. J I P  | Talk 09:41, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Many people working on robotic arms, and as for the tic-tac-toe playing, I knew a guy who build a tic-tac-toe player out of transistors in 1971, so that's not remotely groundbreaking. Fan-1967 16:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable and POV methinks. Xdenizen 01:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I have just removed material from the article which would have shown notability; I was unable to verify any of it (see talk page). --Brianyoumans 03:33, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable project. We can't have pages on every university project. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 03:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator. Yamaguchi先生 06:31, 9 November 2006


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.