Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TALK2ME


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:36, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

TALK2ME

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This doesn't look like it passes the general notability guideline. The first two sources in the article (worldwidecorporateevents.com and drogrady.com) are not independent, and cannot be used to prove notability. The Independent Publishers source shows that O'Grady's book won silver in the "Communication Skills/Networking" category of the First Annual Axiom Business Book Awards, but this award doesn't seem well-established enough for us to take it as proof of notability. When searching online I found one source, chapter 18 of this book. This is a whole chapter, but I wonder about the book's independence from the subject - it reads an awful lot like an advertisement, and it retains the copyright symbol when it mentions TALK2ME. All in all, I'm not convinced that this subject is notable enough for Wikipedia yet. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 09:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: my findings don't differ from those of Mr. Stradivarius. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 12:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Neither my findings did. This doesn't meet the general notability guideline. — ΛΧΣ  21™  06:17, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.