Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TALO Distributors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 08:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

TALO Distributors

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This business has only had passing mentions, no signficant independent sources about the company itself. There's no assertion of notability. Felsic2 (talk) 16:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as searches noticeably found nothing better and there's nothing else at all convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  20:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:11, 24 June 2016 (UTC) Keep, Talo is a notable company that produces many exclusive firearms designs for collectors.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 22:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Just saying that doesn't help a bit. Those sources don't show any notability - they just mention that the company exists and produces specialty guns. Can you find any? I'm not saying there's any source of conflict, but the guy who wrote it didn't write anything else. Felsic2 (talk) 23:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no improvement since March 2016 and unlikely to happen in the future. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.