Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TANCREDI


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt. --BDD (talk) 19:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

TANCREDI

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indications that this is anything but a run of the mill furniture manufacturing company. Many references, but most turn out to be mundane coverage such as business registration listings, patent applications, etc. A reference to a Time magazine article could not be verified (a search of Time's archives for the period in question yields no results). Other references are too vaguely worded to be properly verified. (E.g. a reference to "Vogue Home", a publication that cannot be verified -- is it a special edition of Vogue magazine, or something else entirely?) WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * This is a really stupid argomentation, the Company exists and you can find tons of references on Google, Bing and Yahoo. I vote for keep it (maybe a few arrangmentes on the page are needed, but not deletion at all!) TiWikiInculoAssInTheDani61 (talk) 23:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I've made the base article and added a few of those reference. Unfortunately those publication you quote are Italian one, translation is not made properly (I don't think they need to be translated anyway). I will see if I can find the original articles to post you. Bless — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdmondDantesOfMonteCristo (talk • contribs) 18:04, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello again! I found some of the sources that I used to do a thesis on this company when I graduated. I made a fast collage (forgive the quality, I have made ​​it the phone just now ^_^ ) in which there are many of the references that are indicated in the article. I try to see if I can find others around (some of them I've had directly consulted in the library or in the company headquarter, and I do not have a copy), but I think these are enough. Here the link for the publications / references: [] — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdmondDantesOfMonteCristo (talk • contribs) 18:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment The text is too blurry to read in these photos, but these all appear to be brief product blurbs for Tancredi's products, rather than significant in-depth coverage of the company, and do little to bolster the company's notability. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:04, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment I vote to Keep the page


 * Comment Honestly it seems you have something against this company. The sources are there (you can increase the image size, (just click on the magnifying glass icon :D ). In Wikipedia you have tons of manufacturing companies that means less than this, you even have a Category for Manufacturing Companies of Italy Category:Manufacturing companies of Italy in which are present a lot of industries that doesn't meet the criteria you've listed above and don't have any references (see: Bombrini-Parodi-Delfino, Bonfiglioli, Pontificia Fonderia Marinelli, Baldelli ceramics just to indicate some of the tens). I think the article is rightful, I can agree it needs some improvement and that's what I expect from a person like you, not that mark it for deletion (you can see other users modify it before giving it a reviewed tag, and you are the first that ask for deletion).

I think the article should be kept, i've seen a few good adjustments have already been made, and maybe some more improvment can be done, but still it's a valid article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marieudeparteu (talk • contribs) 20:57, 4 September 2013 (UTC) — Marieudeparteu (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: cross-wiki spamming. -Mys 721tx (talk) 00:07, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Could you clarify that for us a bit, Mys 721tx? WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It might be enlightening to know that the Italian and Chinese WP articles have been deleted as spam, and that EdmondDantesOfMonteCristo and Marieudeparteu have also been working on Tancredi articles at fr.wiki, es.wiki. This looks more like a global promotion campaign than establishing encyclopedical articles. De728631 (talk) 15:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * All the accounts above (already locked btw) belong to an unfit WP:PAID who went crazy after a speedy deletion on it.wiki starting massive vandalisms (half of the usernames he used in this RfD are definitely abusive). --Vituzzu (talk) 00:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I've made a few more improvements on the page, so it now is pretty clear, with a neutral tone. Hope you appreciate this. Since this is a major Italian company, I don't understand all of this, but it's okay. Please check the page and tell me if something is missing or has to be improved. Thanks and bless you all guys! — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdmondDantesOfMonteCristo (talk • contribs) 02:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

I also think this is an article to maintain, since the company is very well known here in Italy. I have corrected the article so it is truly neutral now (there was still something that could make you think of an advertising content). Salvio661 (talk) 22:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC) — Salvio661 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

just red the article, page it's okay, don't see any spam or ads, keep it CarloMarino (talk) 23:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC) — CarloMarino (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. )

Thank you guys for all the advices! As I told before, this is a company that I did a thesis at the University of Padua, if it was not important they would not accept the thesis! I do not want to advertise Tancredi but I think it is one of the major Italian company (if you look in Google you will realize it) and thought it should stay on Wikipedia. If you want to remove the links or the notes it'ss fine but do not tell me that it is spam, or any company under 100 million in revenue should not be present in Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdmondDantesOfMonteCristo (talk • contribs) 23:28, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

I think this is a proper article. Keep it. TiWikiInculoAssInTheDani61 (talk) 23:51, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

I think this is a proper article. Keep it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.95.213.203 (talk) 00:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have semiprotected this AFD and stricken the votes of the checkuser ✅ sockpuppets. ' votes. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. Blatant hoax, cross-wiki vandalism. Considering the fact the creator knows how to edit Wikipedia, and to create multiple accounts (including those that are blatantly attacking people) and change his IPs, I recommend to salt this page as well. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!  See terms and conditions.  01:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt - obvious promo-spam from block-evading sock-puppets. All sources appear to be WP:ROUTINE government registrations, directory listings, WP:PRIMARY sources or catalogues. Having gone through the list, I'm yet to find an instance of significant coverage in a reliable source, let alone the multiple sources required to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Stalwart 111  02:05, 10 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt per Tbnotch and Stalwart111. TimL &bull; talk 17:21, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.