Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAXAB (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

TAXAB
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In its current form, this article is blatant advertising. The text is promotional in tone, and completely unreferenced. While there are a few news articles about population control in India that mention this organization in passing, they don't provide any in-depth coverage, and this article would need to be completely rewritten even if such in-depth coverage could be found. For now, this fails WP:ORG. Brad v  12:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - I would have nominated this for speedy deletion as grossly promotional had it not already been at AfD. I have removed a section that was a copyvio, and the rest of the article is probably a copyvio too, being written in the first person. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete not of encyclopedic value as it is a very local organization. sources do not establish notability either.104.163.148.25 (talk) 01:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a notable group, and the content is awful. I'm not sure there's enough to mention this group in the section on Two-child policy in India. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 01:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC) edited by power~enwiki ( π ,  ν ) 04:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable group, possibly promotional. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nothing encyclopedic here. bd2412  T 03:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.