Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TB11Cs4H1 snoRNA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Small nucleolar RNA. Liz Read! Talk! 08:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

TB11Cs4H1 snoRNA

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG; based off one source and WP:BEFORE was no help. One source has only very slight, passing coverage that I doubt even verifies most of the claims here anyway. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 15:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. 🌺 Cremastra  (talk) 15:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge with Small nucleolar RNA: unlike TB11Cs3H2, this one is actually referenced by a handful of academic publications. Not enough for an article, but enough for a one-sentence mention in the target. Owen&times; &#9742;  17:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge as above - it's apparently a thing, but not an article-level thing. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge. Not enough content and potential to justify a separate article. 22:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.