Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TB8Cs3H1 snoRNA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  06:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

TB8Cs3H1 snoRNA

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:NBIOL and WP:GNG. No source besides one paper. Hongsy (talk) 04:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Hongsy (talk) 04:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * See my comment on TB10Cs1H3 snoRNA where I also !voted delete; we are here to summarise multiple sources for the benefit of our readers. Where there is only one (primary) source, there's no point in trying to create an overview. A good indication of notability for a biomolecule is probably when it's appeared in review articles (or other general sources). Elemimele (talk) 18:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Delete, unless a secondary source can be found. Owen&times; &#9742;  14:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.