Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TBHG


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Luigi30 (&Tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa;) 02:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

TBHG
Non-notable, internet "guild" serves no purpose to wikipedia. No meaningful content about anything. In The Flesh? 08:35, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. In The Flesh? 08:35, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * If you nominate the article you don't need to vote again, it's implied your vote is delete. - Randwicked 08:54, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

An annoying friend I'm afraid.
 * Delete. Nothing but a Neopets fan club. This is not of encyclopedic interest. - Randwicked 08:54, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - I noticed that the author doesn't realise that they can vote. They added this to the start of the article, "Comment to Note above - TBHG is a highly prominant group amongst millions of others and definitely deserves a place on Wikipedia. Other influential websites such as Marapets.com were added to Wikipedia, nominating this for deletion because of a lack of knowledge of an area of the internet is absurd.".  This says to me that its a good faith attempt at an article, so I am going to write to them and welcome them to Wikipedia.  I hope that they are not disheartened, as a lot of new users are when their articles are nominated for deletion. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 08:58, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 *  Comment - changed my mind on the whole welcoming newbies angle after seeing this . Note that that vandalism (adding "cheese" lots of times - it hurt my browser to look) was their only other edit besides this article here. .  Of course, perhaps benefit of the doubt in that they are 2 months apart, its an IP address, and it might be a different user... even still, looks like a vandal. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 09:02, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom--nixie 09:08, 4 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.