Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TCO-Vidéo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

TCO-Vidéo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Maybe spam, as no references, no notabilities? 333-blue 14:29, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:34, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't see how this would be spam, but unless some sources turn up quickly, I recommend deletion for failing the verifiability policy. A web search turns up nothing, so sources will probably have to be of the good old dead-tree kind. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there are no signs of a better notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  22:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.