Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TCU library scandal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as attack page, bolstered by evidence of WP:SNOW. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 22:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

TCU library scandal
Delete not verifiable, attack page, not notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia 2775 12:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. However, I don't see it as a blatant attack page. PJM 12:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - storm-in-a-tea-cup. Who cares? Camillus (talk) 13:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This is so small potatoes it can't help but be original research. Ruby 13:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, looks like some made up story. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 14:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks to me like a disgruntled ex-employee who luckily left before he made good on his many threats (I'll stab you in your eye till it bleeds! I'm going to kill all the reference librarians!)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.