Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TC CONTROL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

TC CONTROL

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NOTABILITY - an article about an app that gets zero relevant gnews hits. Also, it's a how-to article, which is on the list of things that Wikipedia is not for. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:23, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTMANUAL - the article looks just like a manual.. The only other site I found on Google was the official support page http://yourworks.net/. Also can't find any user or site reviews of the iphone app. App is less then a month old (Release date: Jan 24th, 2012 per itunes) and is not WP:N Cimorcus   talk  02:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete highly unencyclopedic sales brochure / user manual type content. Wikipedia is not a free web host. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, article about an apparently non-notable topic that lacks any encyclopedic content. -- Kinu  t/c 05:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as a how to manual or a sales brochure, or a little of both. Carrite (talk) 05:36, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Long how-to for an incomprehensible app, and pictues aren't tagged correctly as using the copyrighted iOS.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:23, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a manual or a technical guide. J I P  &#124; Talk 06:43, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is a cross between user manual and sales brochure. Cant find sources to suggest that subject is actually notable. Pit-yacker (talk) 00:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: though I find the WP:NOTMANUAL rationale totally invalid (the issue can be addressed by editing), I see absolutely no coverage needed per WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.