Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TEEN TRUTH: AN INSIDE LOOK AT BULLYING & SCHOOL VIOLENCE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DEEEEEELETE!!!!11111111 - Mailer Diablo 04:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

TEEN TRUTH: AN INSIDE LOOK AT BULLYING & SCHOOL VIOLENCE
does not seem notable, and is also in all caps. --TIB (talk) 21:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 21:31, 10 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - no appearances of being notable, just ADVERTISING COPY -- Armadillo From Hell  21:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatant advertisement. Screaming title could be fixed with a page move, but there's probably no reason to bother. — NM  Chico  24  [[Image:Flag of New Mexico.svg|25px]] 21:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom + advertisement. Melchoir 21:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatant spam. &mdash; Tivedshambo (talk to me/look at me/ignore me) 21:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertisement and possible direct copy of promotional material. ... disco spinster   talk  22:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as definite spam. I have a hunch this article is possibly associated with TEEN TRUTH. --Wafulz 16:59, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above and also for felonious misuse of the caps lock key...--Isotope23 17:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for all of the above reasons, including OVERLINKING DJ Clayworth 17:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with Wafulz. Ck l o stsw o rd|queta!|Suggestions? 17:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * DELETE PER NOM!!!!111one Danny Lilithborne 17:57, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for the sake of lowercase letters and neglected wiki marukup everywhere. --gxti 19:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as said it would need to be moved, but it also doesn't look like an article whatsoever. -- Al e  x  (talk here) 21:53, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete blatant advertisement per above. -- NORTH talk 10:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.