Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TEN Music Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 10:00, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

TEN Music Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The group has notability as per it is founded by a notable person but the notability was not inherited per WP:INHERIT. This article may also be speedy-deleted as I see because it really have no significance. But because of its founder and it is associated with other companies. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 10:20, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:08, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Per above was refering to this since removed contribution. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:03, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * re: - This is not promotion, these are facts about one of swedens foremost independent music companies. Please do not delete, feel free to proofread. Sam.malmaci (talk) 14:22, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The article currently fails to support such a claim. -- No  unique  names  16:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. — Ed! (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - would seem to absolutely fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Begging for mercy doesn't really help - you need to tell your employers that Wikipedia has specific criteria to determine what should be included in this encyclopaedia and that at the moment, their company does not meet those criteria. Primary among them is Wikipedia's general notability guideline which requires "significant coverage" in reliable sources. Facts and claims also need to be verified by reliable sources. Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages or a guide to music companies and whether the article is written from a neutral point of view or not, Wikipedia is still not the place to raise awareness of or advertise for your company. If you want the article to be kept then you will need to demonstrate that the company is notable. Beyond that, editing with a very obvious conflict of interest is always strongly discouraged. So even if the company were notable, the article itself should really be written by neutral editors who are not employees of the company itself. Stalwart 111  23:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 15:17, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 15:17, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails even GNG -- No  unique  names  16:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.