Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TEPS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. --Core desat  23:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

TEPS

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod removed by author without sources or verification. University English proficiency exam.  Dei z  talk 01:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No proof of notability. The only website I can find is the one given website in Korean. The other website given cannot be found and all other hits on Google for TEPS are unrelated. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ Review! 01:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Janviermichelle's link and advice. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ Review! 01:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep check this article and try googling "teps toeic". Janviermichelle 01:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment you need to put the references on the article not the AFD.   References on the AFD don't do help the article pass WP:A and WP:N Signed Jeepday 02:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Conditional keep subject to references. Denni talk 06:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, conditional keep subject to references, that's how notability is established. Right now there is a passing reference in one online news report which is not included in the article. Hopefully multiple, non-trivial sources treating TEPS as their subject can be found and we can move on, I just haven't seen them yet...  Dei z  talk 07:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep the articles does require expansion but I think it's encyclopedic enough to be given a chance. Mkdw talk 08:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The article has been here since June 2006; how much of a chance does it need?- Dmz5 *Edits**Talk* 19:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's referenced in the same context as TOEFL, and I know what that is. Many Korean college websites mention TEPS. Autocracy 19:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.