Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TG Viktoria Augsburg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Santiago Claudio (talk) 06:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

TG Viktoria Augsburg

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I authored as SignOfTheDoubleCross, now blocked, the following pages I nominated. As they're not so well-known clubs outside Germany, I regretting creating them so I want them deleted. Santiago Claudio (talk) 01:45, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because I also authored these as User:SignOfTheDoubleCross and want them erased:


 * Keep: Regardless of your regret, they all seem to pass GNG and other editors may want to further improve them. Seany91 (talk) 13:56, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Germany.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:32, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Articles created several years ago and have been edited since. They all appear to have sufficient notability per WP:GNG. Gusfriend (talk) 09:30, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per above. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep for now For starters, I don't think you can group these in one AfD, they need to be assessed individually. The nomination for deletion also seems floored. It doesn't mention GNG or SIGCOV which are the main problems here. Baring in mind there appears to be printed media for each club is a good sign. There does seem to be issues that need addressing. Govvy (talk) 09:43, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep - no comment on individual notability, just concerned about the bundling. Close and start again one-by-one, for productive rather than disruptive discussions. GiantSnowman 18:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.