Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TGen Drug Development


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 02:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

TGen Drug Development

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

press-release-driven article, lack of notability. UseTheCommandLine (talk) 13:08, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 12:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination; a press release driven advertisement. Clinical drug trials are apparently the latest hellhole for back-office spammers. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article is written as a advertisement, wikipedia is not a ads ballot. Eduemoni↑talk↓ </b> 21:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Retain per the fact that this was a non profit organization that created the first line treatment for prostate cancer and has done more than you ignorant pieces of shit. I'm out, if wikipedia is run by uneducated tards, keep your digital space. All the people who couldn't gain information and died from prostate cancer that could have been treated is on you.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.