Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TH&C


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (G11) by Sphilbrick . (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

TH&C

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not seeing any evidence of notability for this company. Its own website appears to be down, otherwise we could check whether the article was copied from there, as appears likely Noyster  (talk),  10:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – As per nominator. No evidence of notability, not a single sentence is cited, and slightly promotional in tone. Failure of WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:09, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * delete - blatantly promotional, no sources. If this wasn't three years old I'd have speedied it - David Gerard (talk) 16:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; advertising only. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Spam from Day 1. (I often look for a sound version. There ain't one.) Peridon (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.