Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TH3EE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  09:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

TH3EE

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 06:34, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 06:34, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Unencyclopedic article about a non-notable story. The book has not even been published. The item lacks independent references and lacks GHIts and GNEWS of substance. red dog six (talk) 04:32, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is not notable, there's no buzz from RS about this as of yet unpublished book. It looks to be like it'll be self-published. That doesn't automatically mean that it will never be notable, but it does mean that it's highly unlikely and besides that, we don't keep articles for things that may one day get notability. It has to have notability enough to pass WP:NBOOK and it fails that by at least a mile. The closing admin might also want to see if User:Ryemon/TH3EE and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TH3EE might need deletion, as they're the exact same article and as such, also lack notability.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * My rationale behind endorsing a deletion of those pages is that ultimately Wikipedia is not a place to host someone's story-work in progress or a personal web host. (The page was created by the author, as he's already plastered the wiki entry on his facebook page stating as much, so there's a definite COI here.) They might mean well enough, but this is just someone using Wikipedia for self-promotion. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:41, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NRVE. Subject has not received significant attention from other people (reliable sources) as of the moment except from the article creator himself. PolicarpioM (talk) 08:18, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.