Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/THAT Agency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

THAT Agency

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure advertising, cited to promotional interviews and promotional awards  DGG ( talk ) 21:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. Does not pass WP:NCORP. Mccapra (talk) 01:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Page says it has multiple issues which have not been resolved in a few years. Copyrightpower1337 (talk) 01:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep notable based on non-trivial sources like bizjournals San Francisco Chronicle and awards. WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP there is a need to update the page, not delete. Wm335td (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The reason of "notable based on non-trivial sources" is not a criterion for establishing notability.   HighKing++ 18:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Inc5000 awards would make this notable. I agree with nominator that some of these awards seem promotional, but Inc5000 is a well known award by a credible entity Inc._(magazine), which the page here on Wiki also mentions it. Also not sure why the creator didn't put all awards under Awards section. Simple edit, so I will revise. Expertwikiguy (talk) 08:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - INC list itself is notable, but that does not mean every entry is notable. Being the 3,432nd fastest growing company is a great thing to advertise, but I just don't see how that creates notability. There is no in depth discussion or profile along with the INC list, just the name and raw data. I still don't think this is a notable company. Also worth noting that it is not a curated list, in that it is based entirely on statistics and was not chosen by INC as a noteworthy company. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia  talk  13:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with El cid, while the INC list itself is notable, an entry on the list does not confer notability. None of the references I have seen meet the criteria for establishing notability. The bizjournals reference mentioned above lacks any detail about the company, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. And the San Francisco Chronicle reference is marked as originating from PRWEB, therefore self-published and fails as an Independent reference. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria, topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing++ 18:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.