Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/THESM

THESM
was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was

Unable to verify. Created in June, no improvement since then. Possibly vanity? Unless someone can confirm this, I suggest we delete. --Michael Snow 03:56, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * I agree, it doesn't really tell us anything as it stands, and doesn't look likely to improve. Delete. Shane King 05:34, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Substub that cannot grow (he's 30, so he's probably not a huge name in poetry). Geogre 12:41, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: promo, not an article. Wile E. Heresiarch 20:40, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Tiny substub, and doesn't look like he's a big name in poetry currently. Nadavspi | talk 01:17, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)