Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/THE CRYSTAL ROD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close. Repost of The Crystal Rod among many other good reasons. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

THE CRYSTAL ROD

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced ditty about a likely NN independent film. Very poorly written, almost unreadable at times. I would almost say speedy delete, except that A7 doesn't cover films and it isn't quite patent nonsense nessacary for G1. Mr Senseless (talk) 19:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * DELETE AS VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT Chris Cunningham (talk) 19:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. and (ironically) WP:NOT. I think this has been AfD'd before, a week or two back, because I remember making the same joke then. If anyone can find that AfD, it would qualify for speedy G4. JohnCD (talk) 19:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was tagging this with a PROD at the same time as the nominator was entering it into AfD; I endorse the AfD decision since I think this should leave us permanently and it has already been speedied under a different spelling/capitalization, indicating that the author intends to keep going with this.  Also note the PROD-tagged The Crystal Rod:Movie Prequel‎, an equally incoherent description.  Neither meets WP:N, WP:RS, WP:MOVIE, WP:V and an examination of the creator's contributions leaves little doubt that this is nonsensical in origin.  Accounting4Taste: talk 19:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.