Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/THE FORGOTTEN BIRDS OF Lloyd Lake (San Francisco)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 01:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

THE FORGOTTEN BIRDS OF Lloyd Lake (San Francisco)
Article appears to be a duplicate of Lloyd Lake (San Francisco). Author on crusade to raise bird awareness, so article appears rather pov/opinion/original research too. -- Oscar The Cat talk 06:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom, perfected stated. -- light darkness (talk) 07:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Blatant POV fork.  Note that the author, User:Avianluvr22, is also using the original article (which apparently he created) to suit his own agenda. -- Kinu  t /c  07:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * On that note, I'll say that my vote extends to Lloyd Lake (San Francisco) if that gets lumped into this AfD... which it should, since it's essentially the same soapbox-type article, and would be easier to recreate from nothing if Lloyd Lake deserves an article. -- Kinu  t /c  07:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV agenda pushing. psch  e  mp  |  talk  07:13, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, and tagged as with clarification "a flock is a kind of club, and nothing in CSD says the club members must be human ..."  Adrian~enwiki (talk) 10:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, POV. --Ter e nce Ong 11:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP is not a forum for conservation advocacy -- Ruby  15:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete although I must say that the author's assertions that the birds have a "lackadaisical attitude" and "razor sharp wit" made me smile. It might not be encyclopedic, but at least it's interesting and a good read.  Still delete though. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete since the birds are clearly not forgotten. Guy 23:18, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NPOV. Stifle 22:56, 21 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.