Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TIME Magazine political team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

TIME Magazine political team

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is basically a masthead of Time Magazine's political writers, most of whom are not notable via WP:BIO standards. The article never explains why these writers are superior to those at, say, Newsweek or U.S. News & World Report. There doesn't appear to be much, if anything, to merge into the article about Time, hence its appearance here. Pastor Theo (talk) 13:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:14, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete/Transwiki* Honestly I would imagine it would be easy to provide notability for this group, if nothing else because news teams at the level of Time Magazine are guaranteed to have coverage in, well, news sources at the level of Time Magazine. But at the moment this is a) a stub and b) an unrefernced stub (the only footnote is in reference to an individual who is no longer with Time).  Deleting is a questionable point but since there's no question this article does not currently belong in the main namespace, transwiki it to the creator's sandbox until there's an actual article to be presented. -Markeer 15:12, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to TIME magazine. JJL (talk) 03:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Without a proper lead this article would not have much use.
 * Delete Misguided attempt to invent a new topic. Should be covered in Time article with wikilink's to writers. No need for this redundant article with an unlikely search term title. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. A publication masthead at best, a made-up category at worst. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 07:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.