Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TI DSK 6416 (TI DSK 6713 (2nd nomination) nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Microprocessor development board. It's up to editors whether to merge anything from the article's history.  Sandstein  15:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

TI DSK 6416
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per original nominator: "Non-notable engineering sample and test platform. No references to confer notability, and only a small possibility of temporal interest". Currently it has very little useful information and some of it reads as an advertisement. Very little improvement have been done since the first AfD nomination, and as time passes the subject becomes even less relevant. Alan Islas (talk) 17:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are very similar and created by the same user:

--Alan Islas (talk) 17:46, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 3.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 18:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment. Looks like there's two conversations about this article: Articles for deletion/TI DSK 6416 (2nd nomination) and Articles for deletion/TI DSK 6416 (TI DSK 6713 (2nd nomination) nomination).-- Mikeblas (talk) 20:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. I was the previous nom. Same reasoning; WP:NCATALOG, too. -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge a sentence into Microprocessor_development_board. There is a book devoted to this and the TI DSK 6713 DSP starter kits.Digital Signal Processing and Applications with the C6713 and C6416 DSK, updated revision. Hence basic facts are verifiable and the two kits are worth a mention as examples of DSKs at Microprocessor_development_board. -- 21:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. No objections to the proposed merger. For me it is an acceptable alternative instead of deletion. Alan Islas (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.