Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TI DSK 6713 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Microprocessor development board. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  08:24, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

TI DSK 6713
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was previously nominated for AfD on 26 June 2013 with a "no consensus" result. I agree with previous nominator reason: "Non-notable engineering sample and test platform. No references to confer notability, and only a small possibility of temporal interest." Furthermore, this article also reads as advertisement. No substantial improvements added since the first AfD process. Alan Islas (talk) 14:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page because it is a very similar article created by the same user, and also was nominated for AfD before:

--Alan Islas (talk) 14:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, the article doesn't provide good sources and I agree that it is not notable enough. CupcakePerson13 (talk) 14:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was the previous nom. Same reasoning; WP:NCATALOG, too. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge a sentence into Microprocessor_development_board. There is a book devoted to this and the TI DSK 6416 DSP starter kits.Digital Signal Processing and Applications with the C6713 and C6416 DSK, updated revision. Hence basic facts are verifiable and the two kits are worth a mention as examples of DSKs at Microprocessor_development_board. -- 21:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment. I would also be ok with the proposed merger. Alan Islas (talk) 19:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.