Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TJ Kirk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

TJ Kirk

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable Youtuber. A one-off appearance on CNN or Joe Rogan does not make someone notable. The majority of sourcing seem to be social media or passing mentions. Fails WP:ARTIST and WP:ENT.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 17:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  The C of E  God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 17:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  The C of E  God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 17:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions.  The C of E  God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 17:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I have one source here that can be found in the article. Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I found another one here . This is definitely more than a trivial mention. Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. He is very notable and influential in the YouTube community. Songwaters (talk) 02:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: From the article he has non-trivial mentions in Wired, Der Spiegel, The Daily Dot, CNET, The Hollywood Reporter and LGBTQ Nation (although I'm not 100% sure on the quality of that last site, haven't seen it before). There is also discussion of Yiannopoulos' comments on the Drunken Peasants podcast by The Huffington Post and the New York Daily News, and Kirk has appeared on CNN. Seems like there is persistent, non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources. Alduin2000 (talk) 14:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: It appears that Alduin2000 found more sources. Scorpions13256 (talk) 21:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.