Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TLDoc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.-- Kubigula (talk) 02:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

TLDoc

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete unsourced 1-line article of dubious importance that has been marked orphaned for over a year now Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - not linked to anything so wont be missed. Sting au  Buzz Me...   02:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no assertion of why this DTD is notable. A search through google has the string showing up a lot but nothing that appears to be an article actually about it.  Thompson Learning is now Cengage, and a visit to their website to search for TLDoc returns no results. -- Whpq (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.