Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TLF4277


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:20, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

TLF4277

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article appears to fail notability guidelines. Original article draft was full of copyrighted content, taken directly from the product info sheet of the article's subject. I am not an expert on this topic, but it appears that TLF4277 is just a model number of a specific power supply device, and is in no way notable above other devices in the same category. – Dream out loud (talk) 01:00, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm not very expert of the automotive field, but I've heard about TLF4277, cause this is the first automotive IC for active antenna supply, which integrated various functions for direct ADC interfacing greatly reducing the external components normally used on this kind of applications. It brings benefits of cost, space and reliability for the radio antenna applications. TLF4277 should be important because I know since its introduction other semiconductor companies tried to copy it and then have started to produce similar IC families. So it could be considered like the "first of a kind".  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   05:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to Infineon Technologies. I would support a keep if it was cleaned up, expanded, and referenced. But as of now, there's not enough content, so it's better to redirect to the manufacturer.--hkr Laozi speak  07:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect delete no indication of notability and a search just turns up datasheets and product listings, i.e. nothing you could call a reliable source.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 15:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * On reflection I agree that deletion's better. It's not mentioned in Infineon Technologies, probably never will be, so as a non-obvious series of letters and numbers it will just confuse readers that discover it.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 11:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete – No reliable sources or indication of notability. A press release isn't sufficient. It could be redirected to Infineon Technologies, but there is no mention of the product in that article and it can't be added due to a lack of sources. Therefore, I prefer deletion. —UncleDouggie (talk) 23:39, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per UncleDouggie. Hey  Mid  (contributions) 10:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.