Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TLME


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 04:50, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

TLME
Nonsense. Thomas loves Miss Edgley; so what? Delete. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 21:13, 7 November 2005 (UTC)


 * What's wrong with a little frivolity? If, indeed, "so what", why does it need to be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poorsod (talk • contribs) 21:51, 7 November 2005
 * Because this is an encyclopedia. Delete as non-topic. Punkmorten 22:09, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and speedy as nonsense if possible. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 22:16, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I do believe a careful reading of WP:CSD would support speedy deletion under criteria G3, A1, A7 and possibly A6. Probably not quite A3, though it does come close.  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 23:34, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete under various categories outlined by Ilmari Karonen. Capitalistroadster 00:25, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete patent nonsense --Rogerd 03:09, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.