Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TMB Optical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. WjBscribe 22:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

TMB Optical

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't think either this article or the cited sources sufficiently establish this company's notability. NawlinWiki 14:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As with the speedy, i agree. However, since the author may still be able to gather more references, i added.
 * Keep. I am the original author of that stub. (Note: I do not understand why the article's talk page was deleted where I explained the inappropriateness of speedy deletion.) As for the content question, TMB is among the top five or so manufacturers in the high end segment of the amateur astronomy market and is a household name among amateur astronomers like Apple is to Computer users. Give me another day to find sources that demonstrate this, then kindly reconsider your nomination. Kosebamse 17:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Addendum It has been surprisingly hard to find referenceable information, so I'll keep the stub as it is for now. I still don't think it's insufficient but that's not for me to decide. Kosebamse 12:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 08:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. The article is a stub, and should be kept if references can be found and added. However, notability must be asserted. --  soum  (0_o) 10:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, Google appears to back up Kosebamse re notability as their products are near the top of every astronomical equipment catalogue I've looked at. -  Irides centi   (talk to me!)  19:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Artaxiad 21:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.