Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TMCR 95.3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Articles at Wikipedia are not deleted because they are abandoned. We wait for others to come by and pick up editing them again. Dcoetzee 11:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

TMCR 95.3

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Original author is no longer part of the project, as noted in the Talk page of the main item. Rather than leave old information standing, with no author to maintain the entry, it was felt better to delete the entire thing. TrustAM (talk) 05:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm sorry, but our policies are quite clear. Even if an editor (with a conflict of interest as admitted here) leaves their workplace and was the majority editor, others have edited the article besides the original author (a long-departed IP), and under the terms of Creative Commons and the GFDL which makes all contributions property of the Project, this article should remain as station has not left air and is publicly licensed. Others can easily help maintain the article in the future.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: Extremely poor reason for deletion. Page can and will be updated by other Wikipedians in the Doncaster area or even outside of it.  Please, also read WP:OWN.  Request: Since this user is an admitted former employee of this station, I request this AfD be ended early per WP:COI. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 10:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.