Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TMF/MATCH


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

TMF/MATCH

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no assertion of notability, only reference simply proves existence Wuh  Wuz  Dat  20:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC) I've updated the article to address Wuhwasdat's concerns. It's extremely difficult to find online citations that are unbiased for this topic because most web pages discussing TMF/MATCH are trying to sell merchant processing. I've tried to avoid citing those sites as I'd like the article (if it survives the deletion process) to be as factually accurate and unbiased as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indymike (talk • contribs) — Indymike (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nomination. Non-notable credit card risk management program.  No evidence of any kind of historical, technical, or cultural significance that would turn this into an encyclopedia subject. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:21, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Blacklist. There's no indication that this internal fraud protection mechanism is notable enough for its own article.  &mdash;SW&mdash; spout 18:36, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.