Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNA Entertainment, LLC v. Wittenstein and World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 01:51, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

TNA Entertainment, LLC v. Wittenstein and World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This is not a case with any Notability, the contents already listed in the WWE page suffice. The citations are also unreliable and from "dirtsheet" websites.  T ru  c o  503 02:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. 20:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. 20:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - While the blog citations need to be replaced, it seems that this can be done with reliable sources:, , . Coverage from multiple reliable media sites, including two that are outside of the professional wrestling world, demonstrates sufficient notability for an article. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, good amount of secondary source coverage. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, if the sources taht Gary as found are added then I see no problem with this article being kept.-- Dch  eagle  |  GO TEAM USA  04:10, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per GaryColemanFan. While most ongoing trial-level lawsuits are not notable, this has had sufficient significant coverage to warrant inclusion in Wiki Project Law. Bearian (talk) 19:17, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per GaryColemanFan and Bearian.  GregJackP   Boomer!   02:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above. Jeff Silvers (talk) 16:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.