Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TOPYX Social LMS (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 03:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

TOPYX Social LMS
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable software. Lots of references, some to press releases from this company, some to dictionary definitions and some that don't mention this software at all. None provide the in depth independent coverage required by the GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:50, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Social LMS software is supported by notable references, including a peer reviewed journal article which is in accordance with the GNG. Updated sources supporting TOPYX social LMS are reliable according to GNG standards. Citations that were not independent of the subject have been removed. Caliandson (talk) 08:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC)


 * delete - I looked over the sources that are remaining in the article, but could find no mention of TOPYX. I will gladly change my vote if I am mistaken.  Otherwise, maybe an article should be written about "Social LMS software" instead, since there appears to be written sources about this. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 13:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the vote and feedback. An overcautious approach was taken to avoid reading like an advertisement. This process allows me to implement third party citations about the software with appropriate use. I have added the first third party comment pertaining directly to TOPYX under Mobile Learning.Caliandson (talk) 17:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 17:02, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:16, 10 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:19, 10 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AutomaticStrikeout (₵) 01:47, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep I read the article and examined the references and even though some of them are commercials and related with the creator of this product, there are sufficient independent sources such as this paper. M. H. 12:24, 25 August 2013 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.haephrati (talk • contribs)
 * Comment "Topyx" isn't mentioned in the link.  Am I missing something?  02:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Additional third party citations that prove the credibility of TOPYX as a premier Social Learning Management System have been included. Please note citations 1, 2, 5, and 10 respectably.Caliandson (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; Citations 1–4 and 6–7 don't mention Topyx at all. That leaves a single citation that mentions the software, and that's not sufficient to meet the guidelines in WP:NSOFT.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 02:12, 26 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.