Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TO SILENCE (FILM)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 11:41, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

TO SILENCE (FILM)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Short, unreferenced article about a film. Unable to find any sources on Google news. I'm not even sure the film exists. - MrX 23:09, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom Tiggerjay (talk) 23:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not seem to meet WP:NFILM. Mkdw talk 06:33, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - couldn't unearth any sources on this at all. Does not appear to meet notability guidelines. -- Beloved Freak  17:00, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did a search under the title (since that's all we ultimately have) and wasn't able to locate a film by this name. It would genuinely help if we had more to go by, but until we have more data with which to search with I'm going to have to say that this film is ultimately not notable at this point in time.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:15, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Provides only a plot summary (such as it is) with no sourcing or any sort of details that would allow other editors to find sourcing. -- Whpq (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lack of significant sources. LenaLeonard (talk) 21:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.