Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRAI Bangalore Regional Office


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

TRAI Bangalore Regional Office

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A regional office doesn't need a separate page per WP:BRANCH. The functions are almost similar, except that it will handle for a particular region. Merge to Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  07:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)


 * KEEP I really think my article needs to be there because,regional office of a regulatory organisation have completely different functions.as a professor of telecom management and having a phd in it I think that regional offices have completely different functionalities to perform from the HQ.In a month also,the regional offices are to be separate entities with enforcement function and also administrative powers regarding the cable acts.As soon this happens,this wil be updated on wikpedia.So in short i believe this aricle needs to be on wikipedia and a separate article and not to be merged.Uncletomwood (talk) 03:49, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The minute administrative functionality difference should not be counted for, as overall its the same body, just having different responsibilities for better functioning. A separate para for all the regional offices areas can be created and clubbed together in TRAI. It would be really unusual to have articles on each of the regional/zonal office of each Government/PSUs/Companies, as it won't have much content to add on after a certain time. Amartyabag   TALK2ME  13:45, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Amartya,as per my earlier comment I had stated that this regional office is going to be a seperate entity.please a regulatory body's regional body cannot be quoted with a private/government office.the trai office is going to take charge of the telecom law.in short it will enforce the law,and this is different from the trai hqs job.the term cell of DoT is going to go toTrai hence more info will be updated.Uncletomwood (talk) 17:59, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * "is going to be" is not a valid rationale. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven   Zhang  Help resolve disputes! 12:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete or Redirect/Merge to Telecom Regulatory Authority of India as per WP:BRANCH. I agree with User AmrtyaBag Jethwarp (talk) 09:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 09:56, 22 March 2013 (UTC)


 * DELETION not necessary deletion is unnecessary as this branch has diffferent functions from its head office and WP:BRANCH does not exist for regulatory,governmental offices which enforce law.Uncletomwood (talk) 09:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * you have already !voted above, please do not make more than 1 !vote entry. you may "comment" all you wish. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  13:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge with the original TRAI article and create a separate section or paragraph  TheStrike  Σagle   15:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge - Vide this article: Apart from Bangalore, new offices have been opened at Jaipur, Bhopal, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Lucknow, Chennai, Bangalore and Mumbai. . We do not need separate articles on this branch or the others, as they are all monitored by the head office in Delhi, which defines the remit of its branches as its standard-bearers. Information on this and the other branches and their functions  could, therefore, be  merged with the main TRAI article, which should suffice. There seems to be a strong case of merging Advisor,Telecom Regulatory Authority of India with the main article TRAI as well and having all the information on TRAI, its functionaries and functions in one easily accessible article. There seems to be no rationale for having two separate articles, let alone three. Too many cooks spoil the broth!  The main TRAI article could be revised, improved and expanded to give it a facelift instead of having several short(er) articles on TRAI- related issues and branches. Otherwise it will be Bangalore today, followed by articles on the other regional offices and on any new ones which may emerge in the future, so merge or delete.--Zananiri (talk) 15:46, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * redirect/merge fails criteria for stand alone. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  13:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.