Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRENDS Research & Advisory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

TRENDS Research & Advisory

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable. Un assiolo (talk) 21:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Arab Emirates. Un assiolo (talk) 21:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Un assiolo, do you have any policy-based evidence to support your claim? Just saying "not notable" is not very helpful.   C F A   💬  21:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Seriously? This is a borderline A7. The sources are all press releases, a LinkedIn (which I have now removed), the company website, and a few company profiles (on websites that collect them indiscriminately). Adding something along the lines of the three sentences suggested at WP:JN would not, in my opinion, add anything of substance to the nomination. --Un assiolo (talk) 22:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete Sources do not establish notability whatsoever. Also is one of them seriously a job listing??? Procyon117 (talk) 09:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.