Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRENDS Research and Advisory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  04:46, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

TRENDS Research and Advisory

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG with no coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article about a research organisation, listing their various partnership agreements and involvement in conferences, which falls under trivial coverage at WP:ORGDEPTH. Searches find more similar announcement-based items about delegation visits etc., but I am not seeing the coverage about TRENDS itself needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:53, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete: Agreed, does not meet notability guidelines, in addition, listing the organisations partnerships seems self promote and violate WP:SOAP guidelines.Melancholyhelper (talk) 11:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.